google-site-verification: googlecefa9497ae54ff6a.html

Avertir le modérateur

19/12/2016

Stephen Schwarzman -> Frankofil milliardær restaurerer slottshage -> Chambord va retrouver son jardin à la Française ...les jardins de Louis XIV vont refleurir

 

Frankofil milliardær restaurerer slottshage

Milliardær og Trump-rådgiver Stephen Schwarzman ønsker å hjelpe Frankrike med å bevare kulturarven.

Chambord.jpg

Stephen Schwarzman

Chairman, CEO & Co-Founder

Executive Offices — New York

Stephen A. Schwarzman is Chairman, CEO and Co-Founder of Blackstone. Mr. Schwarzman has been involved in all phases of the firm’s development since its founding in 1985. The firm is a leading global asset manager with $361 billion Assets Under Management (as of September 30, 2016).

Mr. Schwarzman is an active philanthropist with a history of supporting education and schools. Whether in business or in philanthropy, he has always attempted to tackle big problems and find transformative solutions. In 2015, Mr. Schwarzman donated $150 million to Yale University to establish the Schwarzman Center, a first-of-its-kind campus center in Yale’s historic “Commons” building. In 2013, he founded an international scholarship program, “Schwarzman Scholars,” at Tsinghua University in Beijing to educate future leaders about China. At $450 million, the program is modeled on the Rhodes Scholarship and is the single largest philanthropic effort in China’s history coming largely from international donors. In 2007, Mr. Schwarzman donated $100 million to the New York Public Library on whose board he serves.

Mr. Schwarzman is a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, The Business Council, The Business Roundtable, and The International Business Council of the World Economic Forum. He is co-chair of the Partnership for New York City and serves on the boards of The Asia Society and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, as well as on The Advisory Board of the School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University, Beijing. He is a Trustee of The Frick Collection in New York City and Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Directors of The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. In 2007, Mr. Schwarzman was included in TIME’s “100 Most Influential People.” Mr. Schwarzman was awarded the Légion d'Honneur of France in 2007 and promoted to Officier in 2010. In 2016, he topped Forbes Magazine’s list of the most influential people in finance.

Mr. Schwarzman holds a B.A. from Yale University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. He has served as an adjunct professor at the Yale School of Management and on the Harvard Business School Board of Dean’s Advisors.

Billionaire Stephen Schwarzman Makes $250 Million In Five Days As Blackstone Posts Big Numbers

Stephen A. Schwarzman - Wikipedia

Billionaire Stephen Schwarzman Makes $250 Million In Five Days As ...

Stephen Schwarzman - Blackstone

Stephen Schwarzman - Biographie - Zonebourse.com

5 Things to Know About Blackstone's Stephen Schwarzman - Briefly ...

Steve Schwarzman - News, Articles, Biography, Photos - WSJ.com

Private-Equity Chief Stephen Schwarzman Is Psyched About ...

Steve Schwarzman's life - Business Insider

Stephen Schwarzman - CNBC - CNBC.com

Un Américain donne 3,5 millions d'euros au château de Chambord ...

9 déc. 2016 - Réalisation grâce au mécénat exceptionnel, à titre personnel, de Monsieur Stephen A. Schwarzman, d'un montant de 3,5 millions d'euros 2/2 ...

Le château de Chambord va retrouver son jardin à la française

Chambord: les jardins de Louis XIV vont refleurir - Le Figaro

Un Américain lègue 3,5 MEUR à Chambord - Le Parisien

Le château de Chambord va retrouver son ... - Le Dauphiné Libéré

Loir-et-Cher : Chambord va retrouver son jardin à la Française ...

Un milliardaire américain fait don de 3,5 millions d'euros à Chambord ...

Les jardins du château Chambord retrouveront leur splendeur ...

France/Monde | Le château de Chambord va retrouver son jardin à la ...

18/11/2016

MyNewsCenterNavigator & PoissySmartCity, FranceWezbSharing, An MBA can get you access to hot internships, sprawling alumni networks, and the most desirable jobs in the market.

Best Business Schools 2016

Full-Time MBA: U.S.

Rank School Employer survey rank (35%) Alumni survey rank (30%) Student survey rank (15%) Salary rank (10%) Job placement rank (10%) Ranking index score
1 Harvard 1 3 17 2 35 100.0
2 Stanford 20 1 22 1 57 90.6
3 Duke (Fuqua) 6 11 8 13 15 90.5
4 Chicago (Booth) 3 36 6 7 14 90.0
5 Dartmouth (Tuck) 8 7 28 6 13 89.7
6 Pennsylvania (Wharton) 4 10 30 4 21 89.7
7 MIT (Sloan) 2 25 25 3 29 89.4
8 Rice (Jones) 14 4 14 16 38 88.1
9 Northwestern (Kellogg) 7 19 13 10 18 87.3
10 UC Berkeley (Haas) 26 2 7 8 19 86.6
11 Columbia 5 31 24 5 28 86.6
12 Virginia 23 12 2 11 12 83.5
13 Michigan (Ross) 9 46 10 15 31 83.4
14 Yale 22 9 20 14 30 82.6
15 Carnegie Mellon (Tepper) 10 29 11 19 39 82.4
16 Cornell (Johnson) 11 22 37 9 48 80.2
17 NYU (Stern) 18 28 12 12 45 79.6
18 Texas A&M (Mays) 21 13 27 36 20 79.0
19 Washington (Foster) 12 40 36 26 11 78.9
20 Emory (Goizueta) 46 5 33 20 16 76.4
Show more

26/10/2016

PoissySmartCity,FranceWebSharing,MyNewsCenterNavigator,America After the Election,The question is: what comes next?

America After the Election

By Richard N. Haass

richard_n._haass.jpg

The ongoing presidential campaign in the United States stands out for its lack of civility and the vast differences between the candidates: the anti-establishment businessman Donald Trump on the Republican side and the polished politician Hillary Clinton representing the Democrats. The contest has exposed deep fault lines within American society and damaged the country’s global reputation. No surprise, then, that one of the few things Americans seem to agree on is that the campaign has gone on for too long. But soon it will be over. The question is: what comes next?

Polls suggest that Clinton, a former senator and secretary of state, will defeat the controversial Trump. But polls are not to be confused with reality. After all, going into June’s Brexit referendum, most observers believed that a victory for “Remain” was a sure thing. More recently, Colombian voters rejected a peace accord that was widely expected to receive popular approval.

All of this is to say that, while a Clinton victory may be likely, it is no certainty. The only poll that counts is the one on November 8. Until then, all we can do is speculate.

Yet some predictions can be made with greater confidence. There is little doubt that the US will emerge from this election a divided country with a divided government, regardless of who is president or which party has a majority in either chamber of Congress. Neither Democrats nor Republicans will be able to realize their objectives without at least some support from the other.

But no one should think that the only divide in American politics is between Republicans and Democrats. In fact, splits within the two major parties are just as deep, with large and highly motivated factions pulling each to their respective extremes – Democrats to the left and Republicans to the right. This makes compromise on centrist positions all the more difficult to achieve.

The rapid resumption of presidential politics will undermine compromise further. If Clinton wins, many Republicans will assume that it was only because of Trump’s flaws, and they will judge her likely to be a one-term president. A country favoring change, they will conclude, is unlikely to keep a Democrat in the Oval Office for a fourth term. Many Republicans (especially those who deny the legitimacy of a Clinton victory) will thus seek to frustrate her administration, lest she be able to run again in 2020 as a successful incumbent.

Similarly, if Trump manages to win, most Democrats (and even some Republicans) will – after recovering from their surprise and dismay – make it their highest priority to ensure that he does not have an opportunity for a second term. Given how much of Trump’s agenda his fellow policymakers would likely find objectionable, governing would be very difficult during his administration.

In either scenario, it may still be possible to make progress in a few key areas. The next US government might manage to enact legislation to fund the modernization of America’s aging infrastructure, a policy that both candidates and many in Congress favor. It might also be able to cobble together a majority to reform the US tax code – in particular, lowering the high rate for corporations and raising taxes on the wealthy. There could even be some reform of health care, President Barack Obama’s signature achievement, owing to serious implementation problems with the current system.

But other issues requiring cooperation between Congress and the president are unlikely to be addressed any time soon. One is immigration reform, which is as controversial in the US as it is in Europe. Another is trade: because the domestic political environment makes policymakers wary of supporting positions with dedicated opponents, both Trump and Clinton oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership, even though its ratification would benefit America’s economy and strategic standing. Meanwhile, America’s deficit and debt are certain to rise, as there seems to be little or no will to reduce entitlement spending.

The foreign-policy implications of the election are somewhat different, because, under the US Constitution, the president enjoys considerable latitude. While only Congress can officially declare war or ratify treaties, presidents may use (or refuse to use) military force without explicit congressional approval. They can also enter into international agreements other than treaties, appoint powerful White House staff, and change US foreign policy by executive action, as Obama recently did regarding Cuba.

Under Clinton, this discretion could translate into establishing one or more safe areas in Syria, providing more defensive arms to Ukraine, and taking a tougher line toward North Korea as it continues its nuclear and missile buildup. It is more difficult to guess what Trump would do. He is, after all, a political outsider, so no one knows how much of his campaign rhetoric would be translated into policy. Still, one could anticipate a Trump administration distancing itself from some traditional allies in Europe and Asia and standing mostly aloof from the Middle East.

What exactly will happen to America after the presidential election remains an open question. Though some outcomes can reasonably be expected, the only genuine certainty is that the 96% of the world’s population that does not vote in US elections will feel the effects no less than Americans will.

Copyright: Project Syndicate: 1agld1r.gifAmerica After the Election

1agld1r.gifGED Study

ProjectWebCitizens, Innovation and IP, Through innovation and collaborative development, Project WebCitizens anticipates the needs of and delivers essential resources to all members of the community.

Create, curate and amplify authentic stories that connect with your brand’s target audience

USE  FranceWeb,e-GlobalNetWork® TO YOUR ADVANTAGE

UNRIVALED DISTRIBUTION

Use our international distribution network to push your content to newspapers, magazines, broadcasters and websites worldwide.

srweb,rsweb,francewebasso,poissywebnetwork,we are readers,creators,and consumers living in an exploding world of digital media.Our Mission:

Project WebCitizens's mission is to excel in the broad dissemination of high-quality Web content. Through innovation and collaborative development, Project WebCitizens anticipates the needs of and delivers essential resources to all members of the  community.

ProjectWebCitizens, We are readers, creators, and consumers living in an exploding world of digital media.

 
Toute l'info avec 20minutes.fr, l'actualité en temps réel Toute l'info avec 20minutes.fr : l'actualité en temps réel | tout le sport : analyses, résultats et matchs en direct
high-tech | arts & stars : toute l'actu people | l'actu en images | La une des lecteurs : votre blog fait l'actu